Are the network efforts of Twitter stronger than those of Facebook?

It seems that length of text increases, user choice of the platform increases. For example for long form text there are lots: WordPress/Tumblr/Blogger/SquareSpace etc , 'middle form text' we have less but still plenty of choice Facebook/Google+/Xing/Linked, but for short form text there is really only twitter.

Asked by Ben Timms on January 18th, 2012 @ 10:25 a.m.
Sign in to answer this question

2 answers to this question

The most relevant answers filter to the top...

Network effort in Social Media refers to the more users a network has, the more valuable it becomes. Naturally, with a positive effort, a negative network effort also can occur, where the more users a network has, the value or strenght depreciates. The way that social networks work, mean the more users, the more value.

While Social Media behemoth Facebook, boasts the most users (around 800million), users in Twitterverse (rumoured to be around 200million) are not restricted by age and connections can be one way, that is a user can follow another user without reciprocation, making connecting with high profile people or brands a lot easier than on Facebook where you would need to be approved.
Cue FB brand pages…

You mention Facebook as middle form text – in November 2011, Facebook opened its status character limit from 5,000 to 63,206 (FYI - that’s the equivalent of writing 61 times over, Journey’s Don’t Stop Believin’), with some suggestions that Facebook had opened the gate to potentially make ones own profile, a blog.

While it’s difficult to say which network has a stronger network effort, a stronger network may best be determined by loyalty, trust, credibility and return users, just like any long term healthy relationship.


To get a broad gage at some statistics on accounts across some of the larger SM networks, have a look at http://www.socialbakers.com. You may be shocked to find out which network Ms Spears holds prime position on…
Answered by Annie Hicks on January 20th, 2012 @ 12:44 a.m.
Really interesting question.

Where Metcalf's rule states that the value of a network is equal to the size of the network squared, this is probably overstating it.

Also, worth thinking about the number of interactions a network with a 1000 users where each user sends 10 tweets a day, is probably worth more than a network with a 100000 where people only send one tweet every 10 days.

But then on the other hand Facebook's network is a lot deeper than Twitters, all your photos/emails etc are on there.

At the moment it's probably not if the it's depth or connectivity that will provide the lasting allure.
Answered by John McDaid on January 25th, 2012 @ 5:09 p.m.